|
SCALING
UP
What
is "scaling-up"?
"Scaling-up" is
the process of reaching larger numbers
of a target audience in a broader
geographic area by institutionalizing
effective programs. While there
is no precise definition identifying
the amount of increase programming
or coverage required for scaling-up,
scaled-up programs usually reach
(or providing access for) much of
the targeted population within a
specified area.
Why
is scaling-up important?
In view of limited resources, and because the reproductive health needs
of young people are so great, it is important to plan programs that reach as
many of the targeted population as possible. The reality of HIV/AIDS has made
this need even more urgent.
What
are the approaches to scaling-up?
Adequate planning is an important component of the scaling-up process.
Policy support, leadership, networks, and cost all related to the feasibility
of "going to scale." Many of these factors can be identified in advance,
during both initial project planning and also during the pilot phase. It is
critical that all organization and "players" who will be counted
on to move the program to scale must be involved from the start to best support
expansion efforts. For example, many activities have been designed as pilot
or demonstration projects, but have not considered the requirements of translating
such activities to a broad scale. Thus ,even if such projects prove effective,
a process is not in place to expand or scale-up. As a result, projects that
are evaluated and show impact are often "boutique" projects that
is, they involve few participants at high costs and are unlikely candidates
for effective scaling-up.
The FOCUS on Young Adults Program identified four key approaches to scaling-up
project activities. These included
Planned expansion expanding
the number of sites and number of people served by a particular
program model once it has been pilot tested and shown to be
successful.
Association expanding
program size and coverage through common efforts and alliances
across a network of organizations.
Grafting adding
a new initiative to an existing program, such as adding sex
education to academic school programs or making family planning
programs originally created for adults more "youth friendly."
Explosion implementing
at a large scale at once, usually with the support of high-level
policy.
What are the principles and lessons learned
in scaling-up?
Over
time, a variety of principles and lessons learned have emerged
that are useful for guiding scaling-up activities.
- Programs
intended for scaling-up should be pilot tested, evaluated
and assessed to determine whether expansion is feasible.
This includes cost assessments.
- Policy
support is a critical foundation for scaling-up.
- Partnerships
and networks providing the infrastructures, support
and leadership for going to scale should be involved
from the beginning of program design and planning.
- Effective
scaling-up typically requires existing institutions
and infrastructure on which to build the expansion.
- The
more developed the program design and experience
prior to expansion, the more durable the program
will be as expansion occurs.
- Program
designers and managers should anticipate and plan
for a restriction on human and financial resources
per activity unit as the program expands. (The pilot
phase often attracts more funds and human expertise
than the later replications do.)
- Scaling-up
has positive efforts on the public policy climate scaled-up
programs' visibility and effectiveness help shift
social norms and foster greater acceptability and
support.
What
are the implications of scaling-up for AYA?
Most scaling-up within AYA will involve a combination of association and
grafting, which are discussed n greater detail above. Using planned expansion
for AYA scaling-up efforts would prove too costly without an infrastructure
to build on and explosion would require significant financial and political
commitments that are not currently feasible.
AYA also faces challenges to its scaling-up efforts. Some AYA projects intended
for scaling-up have not yet completed the pilot phase and as a result have not
demonstrated their effectiveness and political feasibility. Moreover, in most
of the AYA countries there are few nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that
have the capacity to take projects to scale. As a result, in most project locations
the government is most likely to be the only institution with the capability
to scale-up activities in educational and health service programs. It is also
important to recall that taking a project to scale benefits from changing the
enabling conditions (policy support) and interventions that prepare staff before
they being their professional work (for example, training teachers and healthcare
providers in school that is, pre-service, rather than in-service, training).
Such interventions are more efficient and help to reinforce and sustain the
new intervention. |
| |
|
|